Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: MI Rep: Is Centers for Disease Control trying to reduce motorcycle use?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Brownstown, MI
    Posts
    16,607

    Default MI Rep: Is Centers for Disease Control trying to reduce motorcycle use?

    Way to go Mr. Walberg!!

    U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.) is asking the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention whether it is trying to reduce motorcycle ridership by pursuing a federal mandatory motorcycle helmet law, the American Motorcyclist Association reports.
    The congressman also is questioning the economic impacts the CDC cited to support mandatory motorcycle helmet laws.
    In a letter to CDC Director Thomas Frieden (enclosures included) dated Nov. 21, Walberg, who is a lifelong motorcyclist, an AMA life member and a member of the Congressional Motorcycle Caucus, asked “…is it the goal or strategy of the CDC to reduce the use of motorcycles -- a legal mode of transportation -- by recommending and pursuing a federal helmet law?
    “If so, how would this strategy be implemented and by what authority would it be instituted?” Walberg asked. He also questioned whether Frieden believes the CDC is the federal agency best suited to research and make recommendations related to transportation safety.
    The CDC, which is part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, is headquartered in Atlanta.
    Walberg sent the letter after analyzing a presentation titled “Economic Impact of Motorcycle Helmet Law: A Systematic Review.” The presentation was made by the Helmet Law Review Team of the Community Preventive Services Task Force on Oct. 23. The 15-member task force, each of whom is appointed by the CDC director, makes recommendations to the CDC and reports to the U.S. Congress about community preventive services, programs and policies to improve health.
    The task force is preparing to recommend that all states have universal helmet laws, which means that all riders, regardless of age, would be required to wear helmets.
    In his letter, Walberg strongly opposed its findings and conclusions. One part of the presentation, in particular, “infers a positive awareness of helmet laws with the potential for reduced motorcycle use,” Walberg said. “The presentation goes on to conclude that ‘economic evidence shows that universal motorcycle helmet laws produce substantial economic benefits, and these benefits greatly exceed expected costs,’ however, there is no reference whatsoever to the significant economic costs anticipated by reducing motorcycle use.
    “In fact, the only costs identified by the Task Force on slide 37 are the costs of purchasing a motorcycle helmet and the enactment and enforcement costs of helmet laws, which are concluded to be negligible,” Walberg said. “Not only does this contradict the earlier findings about how imposing motorcycle laws would discourage motorcycle use, but it ignores the positive economic impact motorcyclists provide.
    “Motorcyclists not only enjoy riding on American roads, they also spend billions of dollars touring and attending rallies,” he said. “Reducing motorcycle use would have a detrimental effect on the motorcycle-industry, dealer sales, tourism, associated employment and related tax revenues. As an avid and experienced motorcycle rider, I believe government should be in the business of promoting the recreational, economic and environmental benefits of responsible motorcycle riding – not discouraging it.”
    Wayne Allard, AMA vice president for government relations and a former U.S. representative and U.S. senator representing Colorado, praised Walberg for “asking some tough questions that need to be asked.
    “The AMA doesn’t understand why the Centers for Disease Control is involving itself in motorcycling when it is supposed to be protecting Americans from diseases,” Allard said.
    “Motorcycling is not a disease that needs to be eradicated,” he said. “It’s a legal form of transportation and a source of responsible recreation for millions of Americans nationwide.
    ‘We anxiously await the CDC’s answers to Rep. Walberg’s questions,” Allard said.
    The AMA strongly advocates helmet use but believes adult helmet use should be voluntary. Simply put, mandatory helmet laws do nothing to prevent crashes. The AMA supports actions that help riders avoid a crash from occurring, including voluntary rider education, improved licensing and testing, and expanded motorist awareness programs.
    To read the AMA position on voluntary helmet use, go to www.americanmotorcyclist.com/Rights/PositionStatements/VoluntaryHelmetUse.aspx.
    Now more than ever, it is crucial that you and your riding friends become members of the AMA or ATVA to help protect our riding freedoms. More members mean more clout against the opponents of motorcycling and ATV riding. That support will help fight for your rights – on the road, trail, racetrack, and in the halls of government. If you are a motorcycle rider, join the AMA at AmericanMotorcyclist.com/membership/join. If you are an ATV rider, join ATVA at www.atvaonline.co m.
    ^^My $0.02 not yours^^
    -Chris
    aka Gas Man

    "Why pay somebody else to fuck up your bike?"
    "Custom don't bolt on!"

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    67

    Default

    I,m pretty sure its just a matter of time until the Feds step in. They forced us to wear seatbelts, they will most likely use the same tactics to enforce Federal wishes on helmets. Just wait until they force us to wear bright Orange or Green leathers, you just know its coming.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    3,132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tin Man View Post
    I,m pretty sure its just a matter of time until the Feds step in. They forced us to wear seatbelts, they will most likely use the same tactics to enforce Federal wishes on helmets. Just wait until they force us to wear bright Orange or Green leathers, you just know its coming.
    Compulsory ethanol, compulsory health insurance, compulsory seat belts, and now possibly compulsory helmets.

    Man, where would we be without the government to prevent us from hurting ourselves?
    _________
    Roll away the dew...


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    4,613

    Default

    Like obamacare the feds will take over the helmet manufacturing, fuck it all up, tax the fuck out of us and leave us with a broken fucked up system that doesn't work - i.e. social security, OPEC, USPS and now obamacare. I wouldn't let the federal government cut my lawn because they would fuck that up.
    Redline Superbike
    http://www.redlinesuperbike.com/



    Learn about photography: ATP Members

  5. #5

    Default

    Just wait for our next Prez, she'll make everything better.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    4,613

    Default

    She is the key word - Hilary in 2016 = me leaving this god forsaken fucked up country
    Redline Superbike
    http://www.redlinesuperbike.com/



    Learn about photography: ATP Members

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Brownstown, MI
    Posts
    1,221

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mudpuppy View Post
    She is the key word - Hilary in 2016


    NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! the horror!
    My Favorite Rides:
    2016 Ultra Limited
    2010 Ultra Classic
    2003 Dyna SuperGlide
    1967 Bell UH-1 Iroquois(Huey)



    Most motorcycle problems are caused by the nut that connects the handlebars to the saddle.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •